Does Paul Ryan Threaten the Common Good?
• Richard Gaillardetz, a theologian who told a Los Angeles religious education congress that—contrary to Lumen Gentium #25—Catholic magisterial teaching is not binding upon the faithful until it is ”received” by them,
• Elizabeth Johnson, C.S.J., a theologian who effectively mocked divine revelation by titling a book,She Who Is, and who has recently been the subject of an extended critique by the U.S. bishops’ Committee on Doctrine.
• Thomas Reese, S.J., the secular media’s favorite gadfly spokesman on things Catholic who once unsuccessfully tried to sabotage the Catechism of the Catholic Church and later had to be removed as the editor of the Jesuit magazine America, reportedly at the request of the newly elected Pope Benedict XVI himself.
• Sandra M. Schneiders, a Sister, Servant of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, recipient of many honors from the liberal theological establishment, who in her book Beyond Patching, declared the Bible to be intrinsically sexist, so flawed as to be indeed beyond patching, and hence in need of a new feminist hermeneutic.
Such as these are somehow the defenders of the integrity of Catholic teaching? Similar question could also be raised about others on the list of the 157 signatories to the Call to Protect the Endangered Common Good. But the common good deserves better.
Table of Contents:
- A Tipping Point
- A Threat to the Church's Teachings
- Prudence Misused
- Prudence and Principle, Love and Truth
- Prudence and Policy
- 5 Principles of Catholic Social Doctrine Most in Danger of Being Forgotten or Distorted
- Conclusion
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario