“Global citizens” can be only alienated masses. Perhaps "alienated masses" is something some people are looking for

Global Citizenship: When Words Turn into Semantic Quicksand

by Ted McAllister


We are told to be careful with our words, to be aware of how our words might make other people feel, or of how we might be misunderstood. However important is this advice (and it is both important and grossly overused), these are not the primary reasons we should be thoughtful about our language. Words shape ideas and beliefs, they assist in the mapping, and even reshaping, of our conceptual terrain. Linguistic mistakes lead to corrupted thinking. Because language is social, we are responsible for the way our words work on others. We should, indeed, be careful with our words.When we latch onto inappropriate, inaccurate, or unnecessarily vague labels, we plane off the subtle contours of our intellectual topography. And the more we traffic in these handy little falsehoods, the more established the literal, as opposed to the intended, meanings of the words become in the minds of people in our linguistic networks. With increasing frequency, for instance, we are called to be global citizens—or worse, “good” global citizens. What once was the call of dangerous moralists has become part of the linguistic wallpaper of the half-educated—a label transformed from a splendid monstrosity to a ubiquitous banality.

It is easier to battle monstrous ideas than to fight commonplace idiocy. A revolutionary appeal to global citizenship may include semantic confusions, but one quickly detects an idea—a vision of the world and of healthy human relations that includes an aesthetic ideal, a moral crusade and a governing theory about human nature. The idea of all humans, knitted together by a deep acceptance (tolerance); organized in ways that distribute goods and power fairly; educated to transcend provincial differences of race, religion, clan, and tradition; and habituated to accept the thorough interdependence of all humans—the idea is something that we can understand, can critique, can cha



llenge. When an earnest political activist or a crusading philosopher presents me with the moral imperative to live as a global citizen, then I can engage with her on ontological, epistemological, empirical, and moral grounds. Over time, we might come to understand each other, though we may not agree. And when we both develop our ideas sufficiently, the competing visions become clear and people can choose, can engage intellectually and morally, because they see clear differences. Because ideologies have form and structure, one can disagree meaningfully, using words that carry precise meanings and employing basic rules of logic to debate principles and to argue about consequences: ‘Tis a fair fight.

But when words become dreary or turn into semantic quicksand, they endanger ideas, making words and labels nearly useless tools for defining, for clarifying, or for expressing a vision. To the degree that precise words become banal and conceptually elastic, they enervate our thinking and undermine our capacity to see distinctions, and perhaps even our desire to see distinctions. The capacity to discriminate, to differentiate, to understand subtle distinctions is a necessary condition for judgment, for distinguishing differences that matter from those that are incidental. Because judgment is essential for defining and “seeing” a compelling political and moral vision, a keen concern for meanings is a characteristic of a free people. Banal phrases, cluttering our car bumpers and our common parlance (phrases such as “global citizens,” “coexist,” or “war is not the answer”), pander to our desire to be moral without being morally serious. In due course, a loose semantic emotiveness disarms us against evils that come clothed in moral truisms, but that are disconnected from any serious ontology. We lose a clear and compelling vision of a free people as we lose our power to define and discriminate. Semantic imprecision contributes to spiritual lassitude, making it impossible for us to defend our society’s highest principles because we can no longer comprehend them.

..........


Read more: www.theimaginativeconservative.org

The loss of the institution of the family over the last fifty or so years is a huge blow to the integrity of our civilization

The Family versus That Hideous Strength

by Bradley J. Birzer





C.S. Lewis’ best novel, That Hideous Strength (1945), is a story first and foremost about marriage. As Lewis properly understood it, marriage is our first and most important institution in resisting evil as well as the ever-looming and hovering chaos of our modern and post-modern whirligig we call “Western society.”

“Matrimony was ordained, thirdly,” said Jane Studdock [our protagonist in That Hideous Strength] to herself, “for the mutual society, help, and comfort that the one ought to have of the other.” She had not been to church since her schooldays until she went there six months ago to be married, and the words of the service had stuck in her mind.

It’s worth emphasizing here that for Lewis, marriage is not just for procreation, but, importantly, for mutual help and friendship. Jane’s words are taken directly from the Book of Common Prayer.

The profound Anglo-Irish statesman Edmund Burke—whom Lewis considered the greatest Irishman to have existed—put it equally well in his second work against the French Revolutionaries:

The awful author of our being is the author of our place in the order of existence; and that having disposed and marshalled us by a divine tactick, not according to our will, but according to his, he has, in and by that disposition, virtually subjected us to act the part which belongs to the place assigned us. We have obligations [that] arise from the relation of man to man, and the relation of man to God, which relations are not matters of choice. On the contrary, the force of all the pacts which we enter into with any particular person or number of persons amongst mankind, depends upon those prior obligations. In some cases the subordinate relations are voluntary, in others they are necessary—but the duties are all compulsive. When we marry, the choice is voluntary, but the duties are not matter of choice. They are dictated by the nature of the situation. Dark and inscrutable are the ways by which we come into the world.

When the director of the forces against That Hideous Strength in Lewis’s modern fantasy, resurrects Merlin, the ancient Druid responds in horror to Jane.

“Sir, you have in your house the falsest lady of any at this time alive.” The Director answer him in the same language: “Sir, you are mistaken. She is doubtless like all of us a sinner; but the woman is chaste.” “Sir,” said Merlin, “it was the purpose of God that she and her lord should between them have begotten a child by whom the enemies should have been put out of Logres for a thousand years.”

Free will exists, of course, but in true Augustinian fashion, Lewis hints, it exists only to pervert the good. The choices the Studdocks made might very well change the entire course of history.

“Be assured that the child will never be born, for the hour of its begetting is passed. Of their own will they are barren… For a hundred generations in two lines the begetting of this child was prepared; and unless God should rip up the work of time, such seed, and such an hour, in such a land, shall never be again.”

It’s a hard lesson for those of us who think so fondly of Christianity and the Christian tradition to know that even the barbarian pagans knew more and practiced marriage better than we. And, yet, if we are to believe the recorders of the ancient West, they most certainly did.

.........................

Read more: www.theimaginativeconservative.org

My father gave in to his make-believe transgender impulses and became Becky.

My Dad Was Transgender. Why I Still Think Gender Can’t Be Changed.

by Denise Shick


Maybe parallel universes really do exist. Maybe, as my husband and I hiked through the deep, dark forest a few years ago, we somehow crossed through a portal, a stargate into another dimension—a universe that, superficially at least, looks quite similar to the one I’d known most of my life.

I almost hope that’s true. I’d like to believe it, because in the world I now inhabit—which outwardly resembles the one I remember—everything seems to have been turned inside out and become utterly bewildering.

Yes, I find myself wanting to believe that weird matrix explanation and to resist the more likely truth that the world I grew up in could have changed so completely.

I’d like to believe that somewhere back there the world I accidently exited still exists—that world where gender was a fixed biological fact, determined at conception.

But no, this is not the Twilight Zone; it is not an inexplicable parallel universe.

This is 21st century America, and, according to an ABC news article on guidelines recently handed down by the U.S. Departments of Justice and Education:

There is no obligation for a student to present a specific medical diagnosis or identification documents that reflect his or her gender identity, and equal access must be given to transgender students even in instances when it makes others uncomfortable,according to the directive.

Yes, we really do live in a nation in which our government tells us girls and boys should be able to share restrooms and locker rooms. We really do live in a culture that values transgender rights over basic morality and children’s safety.

But the very hard reality in this topsy-turvy world is that transgender people are hundreds of times more likely to attempt suicide than the general U.S. population.

And what does our enlightened culture do about this very sad statistic?

My father gave in to his make-believe transgender impulses and became Becky.

Well, we make it easier for people to transition to this sad and depressing lifestyle. Helping them struggle down the hard road of facing reality is just too judgmental; it’s better to let them move into a make-believe life in which they face a 4-in-10 chance of attempting suicide.

My father gave in to his make-believe transgender impulses and became Becky. He’d spent most of his life dreaming of making that transition. When he finally left his family and got what he’d long desired, he still wasn’t fulfilled.

He considered suicide, but, thankfully, resisted. But later, pumped full of unnatural hormones and chemicals and adorned in women’s clothing, he died a sad, confused, forgetful, and regretful old man.

I missed Harold, the one who, during his periods of resisting his impulses, treated me as a father should treat his daughter.

.........

Read more: dailysignal.com

Osservatorio Gender - Bollettino n. 23 del 28 maggio 2016

Roy Moore, presidente della Corte Suprema dell’Alabama, ultima vittima del “gender diktat” Dagli Stati Uniti arriva un’altra storia di, ahinoi, oramai ordinaria persecuzione LGBT. Al centro della bufera vi è questa volta il presidente della Corte Suprema dell’Alabama Roy Moore accusato di aver ordinato ai giudici sotto la propria giurisdizione di seguire la legge e la costituzione dello Stato che definisce il matrimonio come l’unione di un […] I deputati LGBT britannici invitano a votare contro la Brexit Manca ormai meno di un mese al referendum cosiddetto “Brexit“, che chiamerà alle urne i cittadini del Regno Unito per decidere se restare o no all’interno dell’Unione europea. Le pressioni da ogni parte non mancano, unite ai toni intimidatori assunti proprio in questi giorni, in occasione del G7 che vede riuniti i grandi leader mondiali. Alla “Festa cattolica” tedesca domina l’arcobaleno Lgbt E’ iniziata lo scorso 25 maggio, terminerà il 29 la centesima edizione della sedicente «Festa cattolica», organizzata a Lipsia dal Comitato Centrale dei Cattolici tedeschi, sigla numericamente tra le più importanti in ambito ecclesiale, benché notoriamente sbilanciata su posizioni a dir poco progressiste e “libertarie”, specie su matrimonio, famiglia e gender. Il che la pone […] La Corte d’Appello di Torino accoglie due richieste di stepchild adoption Apprendiamo proprio in queste ore che la “legge” cosiddetta Cirinnà, o meglio ancora “Alfano- Verdini”, ha già fatto l’ulteriore passo in avanti che i politici fedeli al “malminorismo” pensavano di poter evitare. La statunitense serie-tv transgender sbarca in Italia È andata in onda due giorni fa in Italia la prima puntata della 2º stagione “Transparent“, la serie tv statunitense che racconta le vicende dei Pfefferman, una famiglia ebraica di Los Angeles. La principessa Elsa di Frozen prima paladina LGBT targata Disney ? Come ben sappiamo, “l’uomo nero” ai giorni nostri non dimora più dentro le ante di un armadio o nei meandri di una cupa cantina, ma, attraverso le nefandezze di un’ideologia omosessualista perniciosa e perversa, si insinua nelle menti e negli occhi innocenti dei nostri figli tramite le pagine colorate di un libro di fiabe, o […] Il governo australiano introduce la categoria neutra “Mx” per le prossimi amministrative Il governo australiano si allinea al “gender diktat” globale e introduce le nuove linee guida di genere in vista delle elezioni amministrative federali del prossimo 2 luglio. La novità prevede che accanto alle classiche diciture di Mr per gli uomini e Ms per le donne vi sarà una nuova categoria Mx ad indicare il sesso “indeterminato“, “intersex” o “non specificato” di coloro che […] Polemiche da parte delle comunità LGBT di Napoli per una foto umoristica Per il popolo partenopeo l’umorismo è sempre stato il punto forte, se non fosse che oggi giorno bisogna stare attenti con chi si scherza; o meglio: si può scherzare ed ironizzare su tutto, salvo non andare a toccare le comunità gay, dalle quali il termine “omofobia” esce facile e senza farsi attendere. Presentata al Senato una legge contro le “terapie riparative” Il 17 maggio, in occasione della Giornata Internazionale contro l’Omofobia, Sergio Lo Giudice, senatore del Partito Democratico, ha presentato il disegno di legge n. 2402, intitolato “Norme di contrasto alle terapie di conversione dell’orientamento sessuale dei minori“disegno di legge n. 2402, intitolato “Norme di contrasto alle terapie di conversione dell’orientamento sessuale dei minori”, volto a mettere al bando in Italia le cosiddette […] Le associazioni LGBT di Benevento esortano i candidati sindaci Non manca molto alle elezioni amministrative che avranno luogo in 1.363 comuni italiani, fra cui quello di Benevento. Per l’occasione si è espressa pubblicamente l’Associazione WAND che – secondo quanto detto dai rappresentanti – “opera per la costruzione di una società democratica senza discriminazioni fondate sull’orientamento sessuale, l’identità di genere ed ogni altra condizione personale […] Ecco perché l’omosessualità è contro natura Se l’omosessualità è una condizione buona, allora ha ragione l’onorevole Cirinnà e la legge sulle unioni civili, appena promulgata da Mattarella, è una legge giusta. Altrimenti ha torto la senatrice Pd e questa legge è una norma ingiusta perché mai si può legittimare giuridicamente un male morale. Denunce per il corteo LGBT di Bologna Incredibile ma ( forse ) vero, sembra che il Comune di Bologna sia veramente intenzionato ad esporre denuncia contro le comunità LGBT che pochi giorni fa hanno messo a ferro e fuoco la stazione dei treni di via Zanolini, meglio conosciuta come “ex Veneta”. Aosta: la bandiera arcobaleno esposta in Municipio Ammonta a dismisura il numero di polemiche sollevate nel Comune di Aosta dai consiglieri di minoranza, insorti a protestare contro l’illegittima decisione del sindaco Fulvio Centoz, che di sua iniziativa ha deciso di esporre la bandiera arcobaleno in Municipio, al balcone della sala della Giunta, in occasione della giornata mondiale contro l’omofobia, risalente al 17 […] Il gender nelle materie universitarie dell’Alma Mater di Bologna È facile da capire per chiunque abbia voglia e tempo di approfondire ciò che viene insegnato all’Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, specifica Scuola di Psicologia e Scienze della Formazione: a partire dal terzo anno, infatti, viene iniettata come conclusivo veleno la materia “Pedagogia delle famiglie e delle differenze di genere”, a cura delle professoresse […] Spagna, il clero anti gender andrà alla sbarra Si avvicina la persecuzione per il clero spagnolo che non intende piegarsi alla dittatura gay. L’arcivescovo di Valencia Antonio Cañizares è finito nel mirino di diverse associazioni Lgbt e dell’ideologo di Podemos Juan Carlos Monedero. Il motivo? Aver parlato di “impero gay” a proposito dell’inculturazione di gender e omofobia in atto da tempo nella società […] L’Università degli Studi di Milano “normalizza” l’omosessualità Lo scorso 17 maggio anche l’Università degli Studi di Milano si è unita ai festeggiamenti per la ricorrenza della giornata mondiale contro l’omo-bi-transfobia promuovendo un incontro volto a sensibilizzare gli studenti sul tema dell’omofobia e dell’amore omosessuale, organizzato da Agedo, Arcigay, Certi diritti, oltre a quattro associazioni LGBT universitarie provenienti dai diversi atenei milanesi. L’evento si è tenuto Aula Magna […] Mattarella ha promulgato la legge sulle Unioni civili Ieri il Presidente della Repubblica Sergio Mattarella ha promulgato la legge sulle Unioni Civili. Ecco il commento della senatrice Monica Cirinnà rilasciato nella giornata di ieri: ”Con la firma del presidente Mattarella della legge sulle unioni civili l’Italia ultima oggi una svolta storica sul fronte dei diritti. Ringrazio il presidente per la sollecitudine con la quale […] VISITA IL NOSTRO SITO WEB: Osservatoriogender.it SCRIVICI: info@famigliadomani.it

Planning Familial « la réalité de l’industrie de l’avortement est bien plus sordide »

Les coulisses des cliniques d'avortements


Source: lesalonbeige.blogs.com

Abby Johnson, ancienne directrice d’une clinique du Planning Familial au Texas, déclare dans The Walls Are Talking : Former Abortion Clinic Workers Tell Their Stories que « la réalité de l’industrie de l’avortement est bien plus sordide »

Elle a rassemblé dans ce livre les témoignages de nombreuses personnes directement impliquées dans l’avortement et qui ont pu constater combien
« les besoins des femmes passaient souvent après les priorités et profits de l’entreprise ».

Par-là, elle veut avant tout alerter les gens :

« Je veux que les gens sachent la vérité à propos de ce qui se passe vraiment pour les hommes, les femmes, et les bébés ». « J’espère qu’il permettra de sauver des bébés, de dissuader des femmes de faire un tel choix désespéré, et à des hommes d’encourager et soutenir leur compagne pour qu’elle choisisse la vie ».

« La plupart de ceux qui travaillent dans l’industrie de l’avortement y sont arrivés avec le désir d’aider les femmes. Mais avec le temps, réaliser qu’ils travaillaient pour une organisation qui se fait de l’argent sur des vies prises a endurci leur cœur ».

Un autre fait dérangeant : « le manque d’informations adéquates données aux clients à propos des risques ou des complications possibles de l’avortement ». « Les cliniques redoutent que les femmes soient effrayées d’avorter ». « Chaque femme qui quitte la clinique et choisit la vie pour son enfant équivaut à une perte de revenus pour le centre ».

Pour ne pas faire de mauvaise publicité, certaines cliniques ont même refusé d’appeler une ambulance et de prévenir le père dans la salle d’attente, malgré l’hémorragie grave d’une adolescente qui risquait de mourir, ou encore ont fait pression, parfois physiquement, sur des femmes qui changeaient d’avis au dernier moment et voulaient sauver la vie de leur enfant, les forçant à avorter « sous couvert de choix et de commodité ».

Dans ces centres, on accorde peu d’attention à la santé des femmes, d’après plusieurs témoignages qui décrivent combien les employés ignorent la situation des femmes, parfois violentées, qui viennent se faire avorter :

« Cela va de la prostituée emmenée de force par son proxénète, à la jeune femme violée par son père ».

Rémi Brague explains why the Romans’ inferiority before the Greeks was so important to European culture.

The Roman Way


par Rémy Brague


Few have the theological depth, philosophical cast of mind and linguistic range as Rémi Brague. Now a professor emeritus of philosophy at both the Sorbonne, and the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Brague continues to dig at the roots of European culture, exploring the role played by the Ancient Greeks and Romans, Judaism, Christianity, and later, Islam. He kindly gave the spiked review an opportunity to ask him about his vision of Europe, why the Romans’ attitude to the Greeks was so significant, and the importance of tradition to Europe’s future.

spiked review: Is it possible to define Europe as a distinct cultural entity?

Rémi Brague: There is no other way to define it, if we take the verb ‘to define’ in its literal, etymological meaning, that is, tracing the boundaries – in Latin, fines. Europe, unlike America and, for that matter, Africa, has no natural boundaries that separate it from Asia. Europe defines itself as a cultural entity and has been doing that since the beginning, when Charles the Great (or Charlemagne), in the early 9th century, was hailed as Pater Europae (Father of Europe). ‘Europe’ meant previously either the direction of the setting sun, or a merely geographical entity, meaning whatever is on the western shore of the Bosphorus. But with the political and cultural project of Charles the Great, and of the Ottonians (a 10th-century Saxon dynasty), Europe became an entity of its own that had a definite content: politically, a Roman Empire in the west that Charles the Great and the Ottonians hoped would be a match against the empire in Constantinople; culturally, the first ‘Renaissance’, with people like Alcuin of York.

Elements of Europe also spread all over the world: European people themselves moved throughout America and Oceania, and technology and new social habits and mores spread everywhere. This brought about mighty upheavals in the wake of colonialism, and neither the colonised societies nor the former colonial powers are yet out of the woods.

review: One of your most important insights into the meaning of Europe is the centrality of ‘la voie Romaine’, and your idea of ‘secondarité’. Could you explain how Rome’s sense of its inferiority to Hellenic culture has proved so productive for the development of Europe?

Brague: I am not especially keen on the Romans of history. They built a ruthless empire, albeit one no worse than any other empire, and even better than some. But they did have the great merit of inventing law and a citizenship grounded not on race, language, family ties or whatnot, but on merely juridical principles. For me, however, their greatest merit consists in having realised they were no match for the cultural achievements of the Greeks, and then having the courage to sit at the Ancient Greeks’ feet and learn. This provided Europe with a practical version of a theoretical truth: what is mine is not necessarily better than what comes from elsewhere. We have to be ready to accept foreign goods and to prefer them to our own traditions. Hence, we should be curious and keep an eye on other cultures that might have something to teach us. This same attitude was to be found and proved fruitful many centuries afterwards, when America was discovered, and when ancient languages of India, Egypt, Mesopotamia and so on, were unearthed and deciphered. All this happened earlier than the colonial adventure, and it happened independently from it.

The main sources of European culture – the Bible, Greek philosophy and Roman law – all have a claim to universality

review: You also write of the role of secondarité with regards to Christianity, and the relationship between the New and Old Testaments, the rootedness of Christianity in the Jewish covenant and scriptures. How has that contributed to Europe’s sense of itself?

Brague: Such a consciousness could anchor this Roman-to-Greek cultural feeling of coming-after-better-people to the highest principle there is – ie, our relationship to God’s transcendence. The New Testament is hardly understandable without the Old Testament, which we had better call the first one. In its whole, the New Testament is a reading of the First Covenant in the light of a new fact. To use the Hebrew word of art, it is a pesher. The new, unexpected event that sheds light on the whole of what came before is the life, teaching, death and resurrection of Jesus. The upshot of this re-reading was that the writings of the First Testament became part of the Christian Bible.

review: Does Islam lack a sense of secondarité?

Brague: As a religion, Islam has a vivid consciousness of the dependence of mankind on an almighty God. But even at this most fundamental level, there is a reluctance to admit that it arose after earlier revelations, let alone that it might be indebted to them. Muhammad is supposed to have reminded mankind of the pre-eternal universal submission of mankind to God (Koran, VII, 172). His message was the same as the one descended unto Noah, Abraham, Moses and Jesus. All those prophets are supposed to have been Muslims and to have received books or at least ‘sheets’. The main difference is that, unlike what Islam claims to have happened to the Torah and to the Injil (‘Gospel’), the Koran was not tampered with by its bearers.

........................

Read more: www.spiked-online.com

La révolution menée par la mouvance LGBT contre les sociétés traditionnelles

La « Journée mondiale contre l’homophobie », vitrine de la propagande et de la police LGBT

par Pauline Mille


Avec le recul, la onzième Journée mondiale contre l’homophobie est l’occasion de passer en revue les moyens de propagande et de police utilisés par le lobby homosexualiste. La révolution menée par la mouvance LGBT contre les sociétés traditionnelles se pare de toutes les couleurs du bien : intelligence, douceur, morale, science, humour. Elle n’en est bien sûr que plus sectaire et féroce.

La journée mondiale contre l’homophobie a été lancée le 17 mai 2005 par le professeur de lettres martiniquais Louis-Georges Tin (il enseignait en IUFM), devenu depuis agitateur révolutionnaire multicartes et patron du Cran (Conseil représentatif des associations noires de France). Il avait publié dès 2003 undictionnaire de l’homophobie préfacé par celui qui était alors le maire homosexuel socialiste de Paris, Bertrand Delanoë.

Pourquoi le 17 mai ? Parce que c’est le 17 mai 1970 que l’OMS a rayé l’homosexualité de la liste des « paraphilies » (pratiques sexuelles déviantes). Le mot homophobie lui-même est apparu dans la revue pornographique américaine Screw (sous sa forme anglaise, homophobia) daté du 23 mai 1969, et désignait la peur censément ressentie par certains hétérosexuels de passer pour homosexuels. On le retrouve deux ans plus tard sous la plume du psychologue Kenneth Smith, pour désigner la peur de l’homosexualité. Il sera transposé en français au Québec en 1975 puis en France en 1976. Dès l’origine donc, ce mot porte la marque de la confusion, qui sera le moyen premier de la propagande LGBT et la première source du terrorisme intellectuel qui permet au lobby homosexualiste d’exercer sa police de la pensée.

L’homophobie sert à diaboliser tout opposant aux LGBT

On sait qu’en psychiatrie la phobie désigne une peur irrationnelle proche de la maladie mentale : parler d’homophobie c’est donc confondre toute opposition tant aux actes homosexuels, qu’à l’idéologie LGBT, ou qu’à la propagande homosexualiste, avec un comportement anormal, voire dangereux. Le terme d’homophobie a été ainsi surutilisé en 2013 pour dénigrer la Manif pour tous et mettre dans le même sac le refus du « mariage » gay et certains actes de brutalité inadmissibles contre des homosexuels. L’idéologie qui a produit le mot homophobie écarte par principe toute possibilité qu’on puisse critiquer un acte homosexuel pour des motifs rationnels, ses adversaires ne pouvant être que des malades, souvent des homos rentrés qui nient par une violence aveugle leur propre « part d’homosexualité ».

L’idée que « l’homophobie » est une folie, une maladie, a été reprise cette année pour la célébration de la onzième Journée mondiale contre l’homophobie par deux associations homosexualistes, l’une belge Exaequo, l’autre française,Aides, qui ont lancé « le premier traitement contre l’homophobie », Homophobiol, une parodie de médicament sous forme d’un bonbon et d’un patch. Sous couleur d’humour, Christian Andreo, le directeur délégué d’Aides, utilise la médicalisation de l’adversaire politique pour le criminaliser, comme cela se pratiquait en Union soviétique : « On a surtout envoyé le médicament à des parlementaires français bien connus, espérons qu’ils réagissent. »

La propagande homosexualiste s’acharne contre les religions

La remarque pourrait sembler bon enfant si la police ne suivait pas la propagande et si tout ne finissait par des condamnations judiciaires. C’est ainsi que Christian Vanneste a été condamné pour homophobie en première instance et en appel avant que la cour de Cassation ne finisse par dire le droit, et Christine Boutin a bel et bien écopé de cinq mille euros pour avoir osé dire que « l’homosexualité est une abomination ».

Il faut dire que la pauvre femme a la malchance d’être considérée comme chrétienne. Or les lobbys homosexualistes, qu’on a vus se déchaîner contre les papes Jean Paul II et Benoît XVI à propos de préservatifs, axent leur propagande sur la stigmatisation des religions en général et de la religion chrétienne en particulier.

En dépit de toute analyse historique sérieuse, ils attribuent à l’Eglise catholique une véritable homophobie (une encyclopédie démotique comme Wikipédia reprend leur propagande comme du bon pain). Et, s’ils considèrent avec bienveillance des associations telles que Homosexuels musulmans de France,Beit Haverim ou David et Jonathan, ils n’en citent pas moins avec insistance le Lévitique 20, 13 : « Si un homme couche avec un homme comme on couche avec une femme, ils ont fait tous deux une chose abominable; ils seront punis de mort : leur sang retombera sur eux. »

Une vision délirante de l’histoire anime les LGBT

Pourquoi ? Pour montrer que toute « homophobie » d’origine religieuse est potentiellement mortelle, et qu’elle procède d’une mentalité archaïque. De sorte que quand le catéchisme de l’Eglise catholique enseigne qu’un acte homosexuel est « un acte objectivement désordonné », il est discrédité sans être même discuté, parce qu’on l’assimile à la sentence de mort du Lévitique.

Bien sûr, il ne sera fait nulle distinction entre judaïsme et christianisme, pas plus que le style de la Bible ni la date de rédaction du Lévitique ne seront pris en compte. La tradition l’attribue à Moïse et la critique historique la plus moderniste la situe au cinquième siècle avant Jésus-Christ, et cependant ce texte sert quand même à discréditer aux yeux du grand nombre toute religion révélée, la religion catholique en particulier. Bizarrement, ceux qui l’invoquent ne rappellent jamais la Lex Scantinia, loi de la république romaine bien plus récente (149 avant Jésus Christ) afin d’incriminer Rome : or cette loi prévoyait la mise à mort immédiate de deux citoyens libres qui auraient couché ensemble ! Comme quoi la république non chrétienne était « homophobe » !

L’inversion fonde la propagande homosexualiste

Un autre aspect caractéristique de la propagande LGBT, ce n’est pas un hasard, est l’inversion. Inversion, bien sûr, de la gay pride et de toutes les marches des fiertés qui consistent à se prévaloir de ce qui était précédemment tenu pour mauvais et honteux. Inversion médicale : alors que les homosexuels masculins, par la pratique de la sodomie, figurent parmi les groupes à risque et les principaux sujets de l’épidémie du SIDA, les associations homosexualistes prétendent lutter contre le SIDA. La publicité d’Aides pour l’homophobiol lors de la journée mondiale contre l’homophobie porte significativement la mention : « Lutter contre l’homophobie, c’est aussi faire reculer le Sida. »

Inversion morale enfin, qui proclame libération ce qui est un esclavage. L’érection de l’homosexualité antique en modèle de sexualité sainement libérée par le lobby homosexualiste est un modèle de mensonge historique. On sait qu’à Rome les actes homosexuels masculins résultaient d’une pratique esclavagiste et pédophile. Elle offrait au riche prédateur une petite proie, le serviteur impubère, avant sa première barbe, que l’on nommait puer, mot qui désigne à la fois l’enfant et l’esclave. Les associations homosexualistes d’extrême gauche qui faisaient de la réclame pour la partouze pédophile dans Libération dans les années soixante-dix exploitaient la même veine.

Les institutions supranationales au secours de la police de la pensée
La propagande de la révolution LGBT s’appuie enfin sur l’autorité. Autorité super étatique des institutions supranationales d’abord. Si 67 pays participent à la mascarade de la Journée mondiale contre l’homophobie, c’est que l’ONU donne dans le mouvement depuis 2007 (pose des principes dits « de Djogjakarta », du nom de la région de Java où se situe la ville où les experts internationaux les ont rédigés), 2008, premier texte porté par la France à l’Assemblée générale de l’ONU, 2011, texte adopté par le Conseil des droits de l’homme de l’ONU. Le Parlement européen est en pointe lui aussi sur la question depuis 2006.

Mais l’autorité que le lobby LGBT recherche par-dessus tout est celle de la science. Des maîtres de conférence se proclament « spécialistes de l’homophobie ». Les articles publiés, par le Monde notamment, à l’occasion de la journée mondiale contre l’homophobie, sont à mourir de rire. Tout n’y est que chiffres, statistiques sur le nombre d’insultes entendues et d’agressions prétendues.

Naturellement, ce bel appareil n’est qu’un trompe l’œil. Rien n’établit la source des informations ni la méthode employée pour les recueillir. Qui a posé les questions, pourquoi, comment ? Qui a répondu, quand, avec quelles preuves ? On reste dans l’enfumage chiffré, le plus grossier. Et la confusion est organisée, encore une fois, entre les « agressions physiques » (lesquelles), les insultes, les « propos inadmissibles » (lesquels). Pas plus qu’on n’a cherché à définir ce qu’est une insulte « homophobe ». Bref, nul ne peut rien tirer des informations fournies, seul l’aspect pseudoscientifique du discours est recherché, pour intimider le lecteur et lui donner à croire au sérieux de « l’étude ».

Les justiciers LGBT lors de la Journée mondiale contre l’homophobie

Mais Fouquier-Tinville n’avait pas besoin d’un dossier sérieux pour envoyer à l’échafaud. Et la police de la pensée se déclenche sur simple dénonciation. SOS homophobie vient de publier son rapport annuel sur les violences contre les homosexuels commises censément en France, et c’est une longue plainte, sauf sur un point : les contenus « homophobes » sur Internet auraient régressé nettement depuis l’an dernier. Grâce à la délation des internautes, stimulés par l’association Biche (brigade d’intervention contre l’homophobie et le sexisme sur Internet). Elle est efficace : « Facebook et Twitter retirent plus vite les contenus » litigieux.

Pour la journée mondiale contre l’homophobie, l’association Mousse, fondée en 2000, et qui se proclame « les justiciers LGBT », a compté sur twitter certains mots, tels « tapette » ou « pédé », dans le cadre de l’opération nohomophobe.fr, extension française d’un projet canadien. Elle en avait retenu à la mi-journée 1.500. L’association des élus locaux contre le sida fondée par Jean-Luc Romero, avait pour sa part recensé 2.870 tweets « homophobes » à 17h30. Quoi qu’il en soit des chiffres, Mousse ne se contente pas de compter les tweets prétendument homophobes comme un insomniaque les moutons, mais entend leur trouver un aboutissement pénal. L’association « se donne notamment pour objectif de poursuivre en justice les auteurs de propos et discriminations sexistes, homophobes et transphobes ». La police LGBT de la pensée est sans pitié : l’homophobie n’est pas seulement une folie, c’est un mal social qu’il faut éradiquer par la force !

Lire ici: reinformation.tv