Translate

lunes, 29 de diciembre de 2014

The Holy Father then went around the room to greet all the Cardinals present


No Merry Christmas at the Vatican



One of the more obvious misinterpretations of the Pope is regarding him as some sort of jolly, smiling pontiff in the model of John XXIII. The reality, as Father Z tells us, is somewhat different:

Pope Francis listed 15 “ailments” of the Vatican Curia during his annual Christmas greetings to the cardinals, bishops, and priests who run the central administration of the 1.2-billion strong Catholic Church. Here’s the list.
1) Feeling immortal, immune or indispensable. “A Curia that doesn’t criticize itself, that doesn’t update itself, that doesn’t seek to improve itself is a sick body.”2) Working too hard. “Rest for those who have done their work is necessary, good and should be taken seriously.”3) Becoming spiritually and mentally hardened. “It’s dangerous to lose that human sensibility that lets you cry with those who are crying, and celebrate those who are joyful.”4) Planning too much. “Preparing things well is necessary, but don’t fall into the temptation of trying to close or direct the freedom of the Holy Spirit, which is bigger and more generous than any human plan.”5) Working without coordination, like an orchestra that produces noise. “When the foot tells the hand, ‘I don’t need you’ or the hand tells the head, ‘I’m in charge.’”6) Having ‘spiritual Alzheimer’s.’ “We see it in the people who have forgotten their encounter with the Lord … in those who depend completely on their here and now, on their passions, whims and manias, in those who build walls around themselves and become enslaved to the idols that they have built with their own hands.”7) Being rivals or boastful. “When one’s appearance, the color of one’s vestments or honorific titles become the primary objective of life.”8) Suffering from ‘existential schizophrenia.’ “It’s the sickness of those who live a double life, fruit of hypocrisy that is typical of mediocre and progressive spiritual emptiness that academic degrees cannot fill. It’s a sickness that often affects those who, abandoning pastoral service, limit themselves to bureaucratic work, losing contact with reality and concrete people.”9) Committing the ‘terrorism of gossip.’ “It’s the sickness of cowardly people who, not having the courage to speak directly, talk behind people’s backs.”10) Glorifying one’s bosses. “It’s the sickness of those who court their superiors, hoping for their benevolence. They are victims of careerism and opportunism, they honor people who aren’t God.”11) Being indifferent to others. “When, out of jealousy or cunning, one finds joy in seeing another fall rather than helping him up and encouraging him.”12) Having a ‘funereal face.’ “In reality, theatrical severity and sterile pessimism are often symptoms of fear and insecurity. The apostle must be polite, serene, enthusiastic and happy and transmit joy wherever he goes.”13) Wanting more. “When the apostle tries to fill an existential emptiness in his heart by accumulating material goods, not because he needs them but because he’ll feel more secure.”14) Forming ‘closed circles’ that seek to be stronger than the whole. “This sickness always starts with good intentions but as time goes by, it enslaves its members by becoming a cancer that threatens the harmony of the body and causes so much bad — scandals — especially to our younger brothers.”15) Seeking worldly profit and showing off. “It’s the sickness of those who insatiably try to multiply their powers and to do so are capable of calumny, defamation and discrediting others, even in newspapers and magazines, naturally to show themselves as being more capable than others.”

Sort of, “Merry Christmas, you vain, hypocritical, funeral faces!”
Mind you, these are just the bullet points. Every point was explained, with citations, in the address of over 3100 words, which took about 32 minutes. There are 20 footnotes.  HERE
................



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZX2DItUvPmM





L’Eglise, parfois guettée par des loups quand les bergers sommeillent sous le ciel étoilé


Le Pape nettoie au laser 
les plaies de la Curie romaine

par Denis Lensel


« Terrorisme des bavardages » pratiqué « toujours dans le dos », « Alzheimer spirituel », « schizophrénie existentielle », « hypocrisie typique du vide spirituel », perte des « sentiments de Jésus », « maladie des cercles fermés », « recherche insatiable du pouvoir » : Le style latino-américain très direct du pape François a soufflé en tempête hier sous les voûtes du Vatican, contrastant avec le ton feutré des papes précédents qui enrobaient leurs quelques remarques et leurs rares remontrances dans une onction demeurant douce aux oreilles cardinalices.

Il est vrai que la fin du pontificat de l’immédiat prédécesseur de François, Benoît XVI, sans illusions mais plus réservé, avait laissé entrevoir l’étendue hélas importante des intrigues et des manœuvres de la Curie romaine, après les dernières années héroïques mais difficiles de Jean-Paul II. Voilà sans doute pourquoi le pape Jorge Mario Bergoglio a versé une douche froide sur ceux de ses proches collaborateurs qu’il considère comme trop tièdes.

..........




Dix Commandements: Roberto Benigni n’a pas d’équivalent en France


Le phénomène Benigni

par Natalia BOTTINEAU
L’acteur et réalisateur, Roberto Benigni n’a pas d’équivalent en France. Avec ses Dix Commandements sur la première chaîne publique italienne (RAI 1), les lundi 15 et mardi 16 décembre, il a tenu en haleine les téléspectateurs pendant deux fois deux heures en « prime time » (21 h 15 - 23 h15), en direct de Cinecittà : plus de 33% de taux d’audience lundi, avec plus de 9 millions de téléspectateurs, et 38,32% mardi soir, avec 10, 250 millions. Notre correspondante à Rome tente de retranscrire cet enthousiasme.

En 2012, pour son commentaire de la Constitution italienne Benigni avait obtenu une audience de 43,94%, avec plus de 12,6 millions de téléspectateurs. Un succès qui ne s’est pas démenti pour son commentaire de l’hymne national italien  : l’hymne de Mameli.

Et après son magistral Dante, Benigni a plongé son public, cette fois, dans l’univers de Moïse et de Jésus. Passion­nant Exode. Surprenant. Pas un commentaire des articles du Catéchisme de l’Église catholique. Mais, dès le premier soir, il annonçait la couleur « mys­tique »  : « Si Dieu n’est pas arrivé, je ne commence pas.» Puis  : « Ce soir nous devons croire en Dieu. »

Une morale du bonheur. Une exhortation à la vie et à l’amour.

...............


Lire la suite: www.france-catholique.fr



Lire aussi :

Roberto Benigni revisite Les Dix Commandements

http://www.judaicine.fr/actualites/...

Roberto Benigni fait des miracles sur la RAI

http://www.lemonde.fr/europe/articl...

Dix millions d’Italiens devant les "Dix commandements" de Benigni

http://www.lexpress.fr/actualites/1...

In a terrorized world increasingly suspicious of cultural relativism, calls for a return to humanistic principles and the anchor they promise are bound to resurface.


Catholic Higher Education in Ruins



Before there was Pope Francis, there was a different Francis from Assisi, Italy. Back in the twelfth century, St. Francis heard the call to fix a church falling into ruins. Now it is the twenty-first century, and this Francis ought to hear the call to fix Catholic colleges falling into ruins.

Recent incidents at Notre Dame, Marquette, and Catholic University of America trouble me, because they stir up memories of the muddled theology that corrupted my Catholic youth, led me into terrible confusion, and ultimately led me to leave the Church. Since I am a professor, the prospect of Catholic higher education unraveling is doubly alarming.

“Who am I to judge?”

Five words that bring back lots of difficult memories. It was a quote taken out of context. I get it.

Pope Francis didn’t really say what the Advocate and the Human Rights Campaign thought he said. But I’ve been through this before. The idea emerges from time to time in corners of the Catholic world: greed and economic exploitation are exceptional crimes, while lustful crimes do less harm and ought not to be subject to righteous indignation.

Run a soup kitchen, collect blankets for the homeless, preach about generosity, and don’t give people a hard time about forbidden private acts that bring them pleasure. If you don’t sermonize about what people are doing in the dark on Saturday night, then maybe they will feel more welcome at Sunday mass. More people saved, no harm done.

This medley of sexual anarchy and socialism, festooned with calls to charity and lopsided clippings from Matthew 25, helped my parents rationalize their decisions. My father and mother split up just as I was born. My father would go on to more lovers and wives than I care to count, and my mother would raise me together with another divorced woman who was her lover for almost two decades.


- Obligations Economic and Sexual ...

- Strike One: The University of Notre Dame ...

- Strike Two: Marquette’s Kibosh ...

- Strike Three: Catholic University’s Students against “Christian fascists” ...

- Three Strikes. Who’s Out? ...


...................


Read more: www.crisismagazine.com


The anachronistic confraternal peace gesture takes the soul, mind, and body away from the necessary contemplative prayer


The Liturgical “Sign of Peace”: 
Move or Remove?



At the request of Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI, a requisite inquiry into the timely appropriateness of the Latin Rite’s gesture of peace shared amongst the people during the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass commenced almost a decade ago. The Vatican’s Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments (“the Congregation”), under the papal authority of a new Holy Father, Francis, disseminated publicly this year their conclusions on the placement of the gesture. 

In its Circular Letter on the Ritual Expression of the Gift of Peace at Mass, the Congregation, although reiterating authoritative instruction on the avoidance of gestural abuses, decided that the gesture shall remain in the current liturgical place.

It is indeed born of a sound theology that amongst the faithful there is some sign of peace during the Mass, which in the current Novus Ordo Missae (contemporary Ordinary Mass) occurs prior to the breaking of the consecrated body and soon before Catholics of good conscience are invited to consume the actual flesh and blood of God. Further, the gesture also correlates with doctrinal teaching on communal worship and Christian fraternity.

Benedict XVI’s request for study of the topic, however, brings papal credence to the idea that the placement of the gesture is thoroughly and unreasonably anachronistic. Quoth Benedict XVI 2007 post-synodal apostolic exhortation Sacramentum Caritatis:
Taking into account ancient and venerable customs and the wishes expressed by the Synod Fathers, I have asked the competent curial offices to study the possibility of moving the sign of peace to another place, such as before the presentation of the gifts at the altar.
Indeed, it is the place of the peace gesture in the Novus Ordo Missae that is the problem.

Rather than reminding the faithful that they are sharing in a solemn sacrifice and preparing to participate communally in worship (lex orandi), and in the Supper of the Lord, receiving His very body and blood as did the apostles on the night that they were told He was to become the Passover Paschal Lamb, the gesture of peace in its current place obliterates the reverence of the moment.

As Saint John Paul II reminded the faithful in his encyclical letter Ecclesia De Eucharistia: 

“Every priest who celebrates Holy Mass, together with the Christian community which takes part in it, is led back in spirit to that place and that hour.” By “that hour,” John Paul II meant “the hour of his Cross and glorification.”

If at “that hour” Mary and John on Calvary looked up to the cross, smiled, hugged, and shook hands, this column would have nary any authority; but, alas, the Gospel of John says Mary and John did nothing of the sort.

...............

Read more: www.crisismagazine.com


The suburbs are normally about enjoying family and a sense of quietness



We still want our block of land in the suburbs

BY SHANNON ROBERTS


There is a tension between those who would like to see greater population density in cities (largely for environmental, transport and economic reasons), and those who defend the right to a backyard and a plot of land well separate from the neighbours. 

 In big cities such as Auckland, the Council is forging ahead with controversial plans to increase the population density of the traditionally spacious suburbs and putting limits on how far the city can sprawl outside it's current boundaries. 

 New Zealand is a country where families have been lucky enough to traditionally enjoy a backyard and most still cling to this ideal - some even refusing to consider children before they are financially able to obtain it. Rising land prices are likely contributing to decreasing fertility rates.

.................



sábado, 27 de diciembre de 2014

Surely you can’t get more austere than that?


When Austerity Isn’t Austere


On the misuse of a loaded word

What’s in a word? Sometimes, I think, quite a lot. The use of a single word can amount to a subtle lie. Reading French newspapers, I’m struck by how often the word “austerity” appears to discuss current economic policy in Europe, particularly in France. I am not concerned here with whether the policies that European countries have followed are wise or foolish, or whether deflation is a greater danger than inflation. When you find yourself in an impossible situation, all policies have their dangers. But misleading language that goes uncorrected is always dangerous.

According to the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, austerity means “severe self-discipline, abstinence, asceticism.” Is that the word to describe the policy of, say, the French government?

Suppose that, for a number of years, my spending had been larger than my income, so that I had accumulated a large debt. Suppose also that I had nothing to show for my excess expenditure, which has all gone to increase my level of current consumption. Interest payments on my debt now exceed my outlays on such items as food, clothing, and shelter. The bank to whom I owe the money tells me that things cannot continue like this.

I agree that things cannot go on in the same way, and, as a token of my seriousness, I promise that henceforth, I shall not drink my nightly bottle of Meursault but only half a bottle of Chablis. This will reduce my excess expenditure from, say, 6 percent of my annual income to 4 percent. I call this sacrifice of Meursault for Chablis “austerity.” Would anyone take me seriously?

.................

Books by