Democracy Ushers in the Reign of Civic Ignorance
The many analyses of the 2012 election results are not saying much about
what may have been the central and fundamental problem: democracy.
Notice that I do not say a democratic republic—that was the nature of
the American political order as fashioned by our Founding Fathers—but a
democracy. A generation ago, Martin Diamond, Winston Mills Fisk, and
Herbert Garfinkle explained the difference. A democratic republic
features majority rule, to be sure, but through representative
institutions (this is its democratic aspect). Its ruling principle, then, is not “power to the people.” It is republican
in the sense of being a constitutional regime that is governed by the
rule of law and protects minority rights, and because it is
characterized by restraint, sobriety, competence, and liberty. The
culture of the Founding Era in America, upon which our democratic
republic was erected (politics always springs from culture), made these
qualities possible. It was a time of strong morality (nowhere stronger
than in sexual matters), willingness to sacrifice, strong religious
commitment, self-control, and public-spiritedness among many other
commendable mores.
......
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario